The apparent confusion of assets in the conflict between the Maksoud heirs

In a comment to VEJA, Family Office coordinator Juliana Maria Raffo Montero talks about the conflict over assets between the heirs of the Maksoud group, a luxury hotel located in Bela Vista, São Paulo, who are disputing the values of the family assets with the creditors in the competitive process.

“It’s a typical situation for business families: the confusion of assets between what the business is – represented here by the interests of the creditors – and the heirs’ appetite for the value arising from that business,” explains Juliana, who also comments on the importance of succession planning in family businesses to mitigate these risks.

Check out the full article at https://veja.abril.com.br/coluna/radar-economico/a-aparente-confusao-patrimonial-em-conflito-entre-herdeiros-do-maksoud

Related publications

How long must a couple live together to be entitled to inherit?

In an article for ESTADÃO’s E-Investidor, Samantha Teresa Berard Jorge talks about the decision of couples who choose to just “put their toothbrushes together” and not formalize a stable union. However, the legal consequences can vary, especially in relation to inheritance, since Brazilian legislation defines “necessary heirs” as those who are entitled to the share of the assets left by the deceased, called legitimate inheritance. “In order for the right to inheritance to be recognized, the stable union must be judicially recognized, if a public…

New models in contracting must not infringe rights provided for by law.

The world of work has experienced major changes in contractual relations, including due to the easing of laws, which often raise doubts and can lead to lawsuits. In an interview for Rede Jornal Contábil, partner Alexandre Fragoso Silvestre comments on the major changes in contractual relations seen in the labor market and proposes to explain about outsourcing – presenting the understandings of the Superior Labor Court (TST) and the Federal Supreme Court (STF) – and crowdworking, from a legal point of view. Read more at:…

Divergences between the STF and TST on pejotization

In an article for Revista Consultor Jurídico (ConJur), partner Alexandre Fragoso Silvestre talks about the news that has emerged about STF decisions that change previous TST and TRT decisions. These decisions mainly deal with the recognition of employment relationships for workers hired as legal entities. “The case being discussed must be closely connected, correlated, bring the same facts, so that it can then have its merits assessed. In other words, in order to allow pejotização, for example, of doctors or any other liberal professional, it…