Divergences between the STF and TST on pejotization

In an article for Revista Consultor Jurídico (ConJur), partner Alexandre Fragoso Silvestre talks about the news that has emerged about STF decisions that change previous TST and TRT decisions. These decisions mainly deal with the recognition of employment relationships for workers hired as legal entities.

“The case being discussed must be closely connected, correlated, bring the same facts, so that it can then have its merits assessed. In other words, in order to allow pejotização, for example, of doctors or any other liberal professional, it is essential that in the ordinary instances it has not been proven that there was fraud, or that the four main requirements of the employment relationship were not present, namely: onerousness, personality, habituality and subordination”, explains Alexandre.

Read the full article at https://www.conjur.com.br/2024-mai-25/divergencias-entre-stf-e-tst-em-relacao-a-pejotizacao/

Related publications

11 tax’s key Issues for multinationals and Brazilian companies

Briganti Advogados, as a renowned Tax Law office and international operations, supports the search for the best tax efficiency for Brazilian and foreign companies that run trades across various jurisdictions. This action seeks to plan the beginning of the business, whether it is the purchase and sale, distribution, eventual permanent investment, or the organization of an existing business structure that, due to some characteristics of the countries’ legislation involved, does not reach the best tax efficiency.  In our daily tax consulting practice, it is common…

Infographic: What PEC 45/2019 approved in and what remains to be discussed?

Law 14,611, of July 2023, and equal pay

Law No. 14,611 was published, bringing a new angle to wage equality and remuneration criteria between women and men who perform work of equal value or perform the same function, as well as amending the Consolidation of Labor Laws (CLT), which now provides for a fine of 10 times the amount of the new salary owed by the employer to the discriminated employee, and increased to twice as much, in case of recurrence, without prejudice to other legal sanctions. In addition, the same law determines…